.
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
November 13, 2012
William K. Suter Clerk of the Court (202) 479-3011
Ms. Marilee Marshall
523 West Sixth Street
Suite 1109
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Re: Antonio Barba v. California No. 12-5017
Dear Ms. Marshall:
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the
petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the
case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S._ (2012).
The judgment or mandate of this Court will not issue for at least
twenty-five days pursuant to Rule 45. Should a petition for rehearing be filed timely, the judgment or mandate will be further stayed pending this Court's action on the petition for rehearing.
Sincerely,
William K. Suter, Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Office ofthe Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
June 28, 2011
William K. Suter Clerk of the Court (202) 479-3011
Ms. Marilee Marshall
523 West Sixth Street
Suite 1109
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Re: Antonio Barba v. California No. 10-5479
Dear Ms. Marshall:
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the
petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District fm further consideration in light of Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564
U.S._ (2011).
The judgment or mandate of this Court will not issue for at least
twenty-five days pursuant to Rule 45. Should a petition for rehearing be filed timely, the judgment or mandate will be further stayed pending this Court's action on the petition for rehearing.
Sincerely,
William K. Suter, Clerk
Supreme Court ofthe United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001
November 13, 2012
